Skip to main content

“Bifurcation of the Court?”, 5 October 2019

 Item
Identifier: UB-005-01-06-115

Scope and Contents

From the Collection:

The Upendra Baxi Collection is a digital collection that currently comprises a single series, Bibliography. This series is organised into several subseries, including Published Academic Articles, Published Book Chapters, Published Books, Published Book Reviews, Published Lectures and Presentations from Conferences and Seminars, Newspaper Articles, Letters and Correspondence (Mathura Rape Case), Other Media, and Media Articles by Others on the Mathura Rape Case.

Dates

  • Publication: 5 October 2019

Creator

Full Extent

From the Collection: 250 Megabytes

Language of Materials

English

Abstract

Baxi revisits the proposal to bifurcate the Supreme Court into a "Constitutional Court" and a "National Court of Appeal." He argues that the current "overburdened" court cannot devote sufficient time to complex constitutional issues. The synopsis notes Baxi’s support for this structural change to reduce the "judicial backlog" and restore the apex court’s role as the "guardian of the Constitution." He suggests that a specialized Constitutional Court would lead to a more coherent and well-reasoned jurisprudence, while the Court of Appeal would provide the finality and "geographic accessibility" required for routine appellate matters. In India Legal.

Repository Details

Part of the NLS Law and Society Archives Repository

Contact: