Skip to main content

“Judicial Independence Or Governance Necessity?”, 10 October 2020

 Item
Identifier: UB-005-01-06-146

Scope and Contents

From the Collection:

The Upendra Baxi Collection is a digital collection that currently comprises a single series, Bibliography. This series is organised into several subseries, including Published Academic Articles, Published Book Chapters, Published Books, Published Book Reviews, Published Lectures and Presentations from Conferences and Seminars, Newspaper Articles, Letters and Correspondence (Mathura Rape Case), Other Media, and Media Articles by Others on the Mathura Rape Case.

Dates

  • Publication: 10 October 2020

Creator

Full Extent

From the Collection: 250 Megabytes

Language of Materials

English

Abstract

Baxi tackles the tension between judicial independence and the executive’s claim of "governance necessity." He explores the controversy surrounding the appointment and transfer of judges, arguing that the "executive veto" can lead to a "committed judiciary." The article asserts that "governance" should never be a pretext for undermining the "rule of law." Baxi posits that a truly independent judiciary is the greatest "governance necessity" for a democracy, as it ensures that the state remains within its constitutional limits. He warns against "collusive harmony" between the branches that might sacrifice the fundamental rights of the marginalized. In India Legal.

Repository Details

Part of the NLS Law and Society Archives Repository

Contact: